Royal Dutch Shell Group .com

ShellNews.net: Wall Street Journal Reports on Stock-Fraud Lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell Plc.: Tuesday 16 August 2005: 21.45 ET  

 

Wall Street Journal Reports on Stock-Fraud Lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell Plc

 

 ShellNews.net Introduction: BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD & LIFSHITZ LLP, ARE THE LEAD PLAINTIFF LAWYERS IN A U.S. MULTIBILLION DOLLAR CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST ROYAL DUTCH SHELL, ITS CURRENT & FORMER DIRECTORS, AND AUDITORS/CONSULTANTS PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP & KPMG Accountants. CIVIL ACTION 04431 IN THE US DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY, HAS NOW BEEN GIVEN CONSENT TO PROCEED.  WALL STREET JOURNAL STORY FOLLOWS BELOW: -

 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL: U.S. Judge Allows Suit Against Shell to Proceed: "A federal judge has allowed a stock-fraud lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell PLC to continue, finding that the shareholders had "adequately" shown reason for the court to examine their allegations concerning the company's restatements of its oil reserves."

Associated Press
August 16, 2005 5:20 p.m.

NEWARK, N.J. -- A federal judge has allowed a stock-fraud lawsuit against Royal Dutch Shell PLC to continue, finding that the shareholders had "adequately" shown reason for the court to examine their allegations concerning the company's restatements of its oil reserves.

The class-action lawsuit questions whether the company's statements on its reserves, an important measure of future performance, purposely omitted or twisted important facts.

Shell said Tuesday that it planned to appeal the ruling, questioning whether the court has jurisdiction "over non-U.S. purchasers who bought their securities on non -U.S. markets." The company is based in the Hague, Netherlands.

Restatements of the reserves last year led to declines in the company's share price, prompting shareholders to sue the oil company, some executives and its accounting firms, PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG. As a result of the ruling, the plaintiffs and defendants are to exchange information, which could include scheduling depositions. The case remains far from being presented to a jury.

The reduced projections also cost Shell, one of the world's largest oil producers with BP PLC and Exxon Mobil Corp., almost $150 million in fines imposed by U.S. and British regulators and led to the dismissal of three senior executives.

The U.S. Department of Justice has also launched a criminal investigation, according to the opinion by U.S. Chief District John W. Bissell. The judge said that the company's global footprint doesn't prevent it from being sued in New Jersey. Plaintiffs filed in the state because Shell has gasoline distribution terminals there.

A lead lawyer for the shareholders, Stanley D. Bernstein, said they were satisfied with the decision, even though it did dismiss several of the original counts against certain defendants.

Shell spokesman Simon Buerk, reached in London, said Tuesday, "The decision reflects a ruling at an early procedural phase of the case that presents the court's views on the scope of its statutory jurisdiction and the adequacy of plaintiffs' complaint. The decision does not reflect whether plaintiffs ultimately will be able to prove any of the claims they have alleged."

The Anglo-Dutch oil company, formally unified last month, resulted from the combination of Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. of the Netherlands, and Shell Transport & Trading Co., of London.

Copyright 2005 Associated Press

Click here to return to ShellNews.net HOME PAGE


Click here to return to Royal Dutch Shell Group .com